1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Nigeria is the largest country in West Africa and shares its boundaries with Cameroon on the East, Niger and Chad on the North, Benin on the west and the Gulf of Guinea on the south. Its topography consists of the northern savannah, the middle belt tropical rainforests and the southern mangrove swamps. Anyanwu (1979) observed that the significance of the agricultural sector to human existence generally cannot be over emphasized in an emerging economy such as Nigeria. This is in consonance with the fact that Nigeria as a country is highly endowed with abundant natural resources including land and labor with a large percentage of the populace living in rural areas that depend on agriculture to a large extent to make a living.
Okwuosa (1970) argues that this enormous resource base, if well managed, could support a vibrant agricultural sector capable of ensuring the supply of raw materials for the industrial sector as well as providing gainful employment for its teeming population. This underscores the contribution of agriculture to the overall development of the economy especially in emerging economies which is apparent in the provision of gainful employment, provision of increased food supplies, provision of capital, capital formation, increasing foreign exchange and increase in the welfare of the citizens through wealth creation among others. Tomori (1979) posited that, the Nigerian agricultural sector has been seemingly, if not totally, neglected with the discovery of oil. This is evident in the sharp decline in the contribution of agricultural sector to the gross domestic product (GDP) from 64% in 1960 to 35% in 1988 and presently, the agricultural sector in Nigeria contributes less than 30% to GDP, with crop production accounting for an estimated 85% of this total, livestock 10% with forestry and fisheries contributing the remaining 5%. Compared with other African and Asian countries, especially Indonesia, which is comparable to Nigeria in many respects, economic development has been disappointing because Nigeria has become one of the poorest countries in the world. Having earned about $300 billion from oil exports between the mid-1970s and 2000, its per capita income was disappointingly 20 percent lower than that of 1975. In the wake of the declining trend in agricultural sector’s contribution to the GDP as a result negligence in terms of finances leading to insignificant contribution to the overall GDP vis-a-vis poor output, there is every need for concerted efforts to enhance productivity in the agricultural sector (Manyong, 2003; Okwuosa 1970). This accentuates the importance of credits as a means for improving farm capital investment in Nigeria with which there may be little or no progress in the sector to adequately fulfill its expected roles in our current economic realities.
Following the adoption of universal banking in 2001, the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 1991 was amended and banking business is now defined as “The business of receiving deposit on current, savings or other accounts, paying or collecting cheques drawn or paid in by customers, provision of finance, consultancy and advisory services relating to corporate and investment matters; making or managing investments on behalf of any person and the provision of insurance, marketing services and capital market business or other services as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria by gazette designate as banking business”.
For a long time, the relationship between the banking industry and the agricultural sector in Nigeria has been controversial. If one takes a vote of every judgment on the matter by various governments since independence and classify them into two groups; those praising the efforts of the banking industry and those castigating them as regards granting credit to agriculture, one will likely notice that the ratio would be around one to four. This could further be reflected in the legislation of governments and the directives of quasi government institutions like the CBN. Nwanyanwu (2012) posited that the setting up of a wholly government owned bank; the Nigerian Agriculture, Cooperative and Rural Development Bank (NACRDB) with the aim of lending solely to agricultural endeavours on short, medium and long-term basis is predicated on the philosophy that the mainstream banking industry does not adequately and effectively cater for the urgent need of credit required to rapidly transform the agricultural sector of the Nigerian economy.
This study dwells on the pertinent areas:
Existing policies and institutional network for agricultural credit in Nigeria under ACGSF policy.
Assessment of the impact of credit on agricultural performance.
Identification of some major constraints that dwarf the growth of this sector to achieve its desired goal and expectation in the economy of the country.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The function of the banking sector is financial intermediation which involves the processes through which funds and financial resources are channeled from the surplus sector to the deficit sector, Obilor (2009). But banks, precisely the commercial (deposit money) banks, have refused to lend to agriculture which they believe that is a risky endeavor because of such factors like time lag in agricultural production and seasonality in the case of crop production.
In Obilor (2009)’s view, despite various instruments used by the Central Bank of Nigeria such as moral suasion and even the formulation of various agencies and programs by successive governments such as the Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme (ACGS), the amount of loans advanced to the agricultural sector is still a far cry from what is needed to facilitate and effectively fast track the needed growth in the sector.
The aim of this research work is to evaluate how far banks have gone over the years (1981-2014) in giving financial support to the agricultural sector in form of loans; and recommendations as to how best both sectors can work together to achieve a growth in this real sector which has the capacity to boost the nation’s GDP exponentially.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The following are the objectives of this study:
To evaluate the impact of banks credit on agricultural productivity.
To study the impact of banks interest rates on agricultural productivity
1.3.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The following research questions were developed:
To what extent does banks credit influence agricultural productivity?
At what level does banks’ interest rate influence agricultural productivity?
1.3.2 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
Within these contexts the following null research hypothesis are tested:
Ho: There is no significant relationship between bank credit and agricultural productivity.
Ho: There is no significant relationship between bank interest rate and agricultural productivity.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This research work is significant in the following ways:
This work will expose to the general public the need to show up the capital base available to the agricultural sector to enable the effective utilization of Nigeria’s enormous manpower and great landmass. Once this is done, the government and policy makers can pay attention to other sectors of the economy.
It is significant to the government because it will make them aware of the contributions of the banks to agricultural productivity and also determine what more can be done in terms of policy formulations to enhance more access to finance and protection of the agricultural finance arm.
It is important to students of finance and other related disciplines as it will infuse them with pragmatic knowledge on the role agriculture can play in an economy if it is adequately funded by the banks.
It will serve as a basis for further study.
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The study studies the overall impact and contribution that the banks have had on enhanced agricultural productivity in Nigeria. It will cover the period from 2006-2015. The data used for this research work will be gotten from the Central Bank of Nigeria, Statistical Bulletins, World Bank Development Indicators as well as the Annual Abstracts of Statistics published by the National Bureau of Statistics, relevant text books, journals, articles, and printed relevant materials from the internet.
1.6 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
Every research work has its own constraint due to some various factors that combine all together to make the research complete, will not in all areas be in favour of the researcher. The factors that militated the research work are:
Time Factor: The time given to the researcher to complete this research work is not sufficient due to the deadline for the completion of the research work thereby, making the research work not able to cover many areas.
Financial Factor: The research work is an academic research, hence, the unavailability of funds to really do a thorough research into areas that might have been overlooked due to financial constraints.
Information Factor: The CBN and Banks management in focus did not release vital and actual information needed to really make the research work unquestionable.
Period of Coverage: The research work is also constrained due to the number of years that the researcher was able to look at, although, the researcher wanted to research into many more years but unavailability of information.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
DMBC: Deposit Money Bank’s Credit: is a debt provided by a bank to an entity (organization or individual) at an interest rate, and evidenced by a promissory note which specifies, among other things, the principal amount of money borrowed, the interest rate the lender is charging, and date of repayment.
DMBL: Deposit Money Bank Loan: these are loans given by resident depository corporations and quasi-corporations which have any liabilities in the form of deposits payable on demand, transferable by cheque otherwise usable for making payments
DMBLR: Deposit Money Bank’s Lending Rate: is payment from a borrower or deposit-taking financial institution to a lender or depositor of an amount above repayment of the principal sum (i.e. the amount borrowed).
AQ: Agricultural Output: final agricultural output measures the value of agricultural products which, free of intra-branch consumption is produced during the accounting period and before processing, is available for export and or/ consumption. Is measured as the ratio of agricultural outputs to agricultural inputs.